|Iraq||What Does This Mean?||Bush Copies Hitler|
|Bush’s Conspiracy Theory||Bush Ties to Terrorists||Whodunit?|
|Preparing Yourself||Motives||What Really Happened|
|Why 9/11 Was an Inside Job||Afghanistan||Conclusion|
|Crossing The Rubicon||History||Audio Links|
|Andrew Johnson Analogy||Mike Delbert Vreeland||Books|
|In A Nutshell||Bush Knew||Roedy’s Related Essays|
|Evidence||Conspiracy Leaks||WebRing Home|
|Why Was Bush Left Vulnerable?||Quotes||Action|
|Why No Planes Scrambled?||Psychosis||What To Do Next|
|Why No Action On Warnings?||Distraction|
|What’s With the Goat?||Drug Abuse|
Even if you are a minority of one, the truth is the truth.Bush used 2001-09-11 as an excuse for two illegal wars: Afghanistan 2001-10-07 and Iraq 2003-03-20.
~ Mahatma Gandhi (1869-10-02 1948-01-30 age:78)
When you have eliminated the impossible, whatever remains, however, improbable, must be the truth.
~ Sir Arthur Conan Doyle (1859-05-22 1930-07-07 age:71), creator of Sherlock Holmes
Let us not tolerate outrageous conspiracy theories concerning the attacks of September the 11th — malicious lies that attempt to shift the blame away from the terrorists themselves, away from the guilty.I agree. Bush’s version of what happened on 2001-09-11 is the most outrageous of all the conspiracy theories as I will show in this essay and the evidence it links to.
~ George W. Bush (1946-07-06 age:71), 2001-11-10, speaking before the UN (United Nations) General Assembly
You can see the effect without the aid of math on video. The main wave of the collapse proceeds faster than the free falling debris. It should proceed more slowly, except for the fine particles.
Further, Newton predicts the collapse should start slowly and accelerate. It doesn’t.
Bush would have us believe that 2001-09-11 is the sole exception to Newton’s law, namely that a miracle occurred when Allah/Yahweh/The Divine Spaghetti Monster invoked the divine intervention clause to give all three buildings an extra shove, as if to stamp divine approval on the terrorist attack as the whacko Reverend Fred Phelps claims. According to Newton, Bush’s explanation is flat out impossible. There is also a ton of other physical evidence that points to demolition, including a confession on video tape by Larry Silverstein, the owner of the complex. If Bush would lie about that, how can you trust the rest of his story?
I am surprised more people who studied grade 11 physics have not also noticed this gaping hole in Bush’s story. I received the top grade in a North America physics examination in grade 11, but surely a few others recall the lessons too. I think we may have an Emperor’s New Clothes situation where people are afraid to announce the obvious truth until other people do too. Or perhaps they fear assassination.
When you finally concede the towers were demolished, you think to yourself, surely the Bush administration knew that. Any curious child could have detected the Newton anomaly. Why did they keep it secret? Since demolition takes a long lead time and free access to the building, who but the man in charge of security for the building, the president’s brother, could have done it? From there the president’s story collapses like a house of cards. It is full of hundreds of preposterous improbabilities.
It took 10 years for the establishment media to acknowledge there were such explosions though they explain them in a different way.
Because 2001-09-11 received so much media attention, the event looms in our minds as the greatest catastophe in American history, yet it killed 3,500 people and demolished three buildings, just a handful as war casualties go. To put it in perspective: 58,228 American died in the Viet Nam war. 1,027,000 Americans died in WWII (World War II). Americans killed 1,500,000 Iraqi civilians in the sanction bombings in the lull between the Gulf War and the Iraq war. 2001-09-11, horrible as it was, is not nearly as serious a crime, in terms of deaths, as leading a country into an unnecessary war, even if it seizes the imagination far more strongly. If a president could lead his country into an unnecessary war, surely he would also be cold-blooded enough to sacrifice American civilians in a much lesser crime like 2001-09-11 if he felt it necessary. That Bush lead America into a pointless war in Iraq is not evidence he was complicit in 2001-09-11, but it is evidence he is willing to sacrifice on a scale even more massive than 2001-09-11. It demolishes the argument that the Mr. Bush would find complicity in a crime such as 2001-09-11 unthinkable.
Most Americans dismiss the notion 2001-09-11 could have been an inside job. It was just too monstrous a crime. Yet Bush committed a far larger crime, crying wolf about Iraq being about to nuke the USA with drones in order to panic the country into starting a war with Iraq. The death toll from that crime was perhaps 40 times larger, so Bush is certainly capable of evil on that magnitude.
If you want to cut to the chase, here is what I think really happened. The important first step is not discovering what really happened, but proving that the official story is a lie, not just untrue, but a lie.
This page is posted
Optional Replicator mirror
Please read the feedback from other visitors, or send your own feedback about the site.
Contact Roedy. Please feel free to link to this page without explicit permission.
Your face IP:[184.108.40.206]
You are visitor number|