image provider

Introduction to 9/11

Introduction Holes Henry Kissinger
Iraq What Does This Mean? Bush Copies Hitler
bin Laden Scandals
Bush’s Conspiracy Theory Bush Ties to Terrorists Whodunit?
Preparing Yourself Motives What Really Happened
Why 9/11 Was an Inside Job Afghanistan Conclusion
Crossing The Rubicon History Audio Links
Lawsuits Collusion Video Links
Andrew Johnson Analogy Mike Delbert Vreeland Books
In A Nutshell Bush Knew Roedy’s Related Essays
Evidence Conspiracy Leaks WebRing Home
Lies Response Links
Why Was Bush Left Vulnerable? Quotes Action
Why No Planes Scrambled? Psychosis What To Do Next
Why No Action On Warnings? Distraction
What’s With the Goat? Drug Abuse


Even if you are a minority of one, the truth is the truth.
~ Mahatma Gandhi (1869-10-02 1948-01-30 age:78)
Bush used 2001-09-11 as an excuse for two illegal wars: Afghanistan 2001-10-07 and Iraq 2003-03-20.
There are four levels of distrust of George W. Bush on 2001-09-11. You suspect that either:
  1. Bush is withholding crucial information.
  2. Bush knew about the attacks, but let them happen out of incompetence.
  3. Bush knew about the attacks, but let them happen on purpose.
  4. 2001-09-11 was an inside job, masterminded by Dick Cheney with George Bush’s approval.
This page points you primarily to evidence for level (4) distrust. These are not popular ideas. Thank you for being open to looking at some of the evidence.
When you have eliminated the impossible, whatever remains, however, improbable, must be the truth.
~ Sir Arthur Conan Doyle (1859-05-22 1930-07-07 age:71), creator of Sherlock Holmes
Let us not tolerate outrageous conspiracy theories concerning the attacks of September the 11th — malicious lies that attempt to shift the blame away from the terrorists themselves, away from the guilty.
~ George W. Bush (1946-07-06 age:71), 2001-11-10, speaking before the UN (United Nations) General Assembly
I agree. Bush’s version of what happened on 2001-09-11 is the most outrageous of all the conspiracy theories as I will show in this essay and the evidence it links to.

A Prophetic Dream

I need to confess my bias. A freakish event triggered my initial skepticism, not evidence. A few days before 2001-09-11, I dreamed of an airliner flying through a glass office tower and emerging the other side with building and plane unscathed. The soundtrack to my dream was from a 1979 Chanel perfume share the fantasy commercial ( click to watch video) with a crooner singing I don’t Want To Set The World On Fire in which a shadow of an airliner passes over the TransAmerica building. When the towers collapsed, I was immediately struck by many holes in the official story and to the similarity to my dream. I know two other people who had similar dreams just prior to 2001-09-11.

The Newton Objection

I noticed the towers fell faster than Newton’s law of gravity would allow from the simple gravitational collapse postulated by the Bush version of what happened. I knew from day one we were being lied to. The towers did not fall; they were felled with explosive demolition planted in advance. Since most Americans have no understanding of the even the simple algebra or physics involved in Newton’s law:
d = ½gt² (where g = 32.2 ft/sec² or 9.8 metres/s²)
everyone dismissed this argument, even the 2001-09-11 skeptic community. For me, the argument was the absolute clincher since it does not depend on trusting or distrusting anyone else. It does not depend on your political beliefs. Anyone who recalls his grade 7 algebra can check it out for himself or herself. The effect is more pronounced at t/2. Apply the formula for yourself at various stages of the collapse. You will see miracles; three collapses violating Newton’s law of gravity. The towers should fall more slowly than the formula because of air resistance and the pancake effect, the time it takes for each floor to collapse from the weight of the debris crashing down on it. But they collapsed even faster. Newton says that is impossible unless some other force was acting, e.g. explosives. This means Bush is either wrong or he lied. There is absolutely no possibility Bush is correct on this matter. The official story does not even make a half-hearted stab at explaining the anomaly. The demolition hypothesis explains it perfectly.

You can see the effect without the aid of math on video. The main wave of the collapse proceeds faster than the free falling debris. It should proceed more slowly, except for the fine particles.

Further, Newton predicts the collapse should start slowly and accelerate. It doesn’t.

Bush would have us believe that 2001-09-11 is the sole exception to Newton’s law, namely that a miracle occurred when Allah/Yahweh/The Divine Spaghetti Monster invoked the divine intervention clause to give all three buildings an extra shove, as if to stamp divine approval on the terrorist attack as the whacko Reverend Fred Phelps claims. According to Newton, Bush’s explanation is flat out impossible. There is also a ton of other physical evidence that points to demolition, including a confession on video tape by Larry Silverstein, the owner of the complex. If Bush would lie about that, how can you trust the rest of his story?

I am surprised more people who studied grade 11 physics have not also noticed this gaping hole in Bush’s story. I received the top grade in a North America physics examination in grade 11, but surely a few others recall the lessons too. I think we may have an Emperor’s New Clothes situation where people are afraid to announce the obvious truth until other people do too. Or perhaps they fear assassination.

When you finally concede the towers were demolished, you think to yourself, surely the Bush administration knew that. Any curious child could have detected the Newton anomaly. Why did they keep it secret? Since demolition takes a long lead time and free access to the building, who but the man in charge of security for the building, the president’s brother, could have done it? From there the president’s story collapses like a house of cards. It is full of hundreds of preposterous improbabilities.

It took 10 years for the establishment media to acknowledge there were such explosions though they explain them in a different way.

More Evidence 2001-09-11 Was an Inside Job

I saw Barrie Zwicker’s Vision TV documentary The Great Deception, What really happened on Sept. 11 click to watch. Ever since I have been mulling over a number of peculiar facts in my mind. The only way I can make sense of them is if I presume George W. Bush himself was behind the 2001-09-11 attacks. This sounds so utterly preposterous, I want to dismiss it, yet I can find no other way of explaining the facts.

Because 2001-09-11 received so much media attention, the event looms in our minds as the greatest catastophe in American history, yet it killed 3,500 people and demolished three buildings, just a handful as war casualties go. To put it in perspective: 58,228 American died in the Viet Nam war. 1,027,000 Americans died in WWII (World War II). Americans killed 1,500,000 Iraqi civilians in the sanction bombings in the lull between the Gulf War and the Iraq war. 2001-09-11, horrible as it was, is not nearly as serious a crime, in terms of deaths, as leading a country into an unnecessary war, even if it seizes the imagination far more strongly. If a president could lead his country into an unnecessary war, surely he would also be cold-blooded enough to sacrifice American civilians in a much lesser crime like 2001-09-11 if he felt it necessary. That Bush lead America into a pointless war in Iraq is not evidence he was complicit in 2001-09-11, but it is evidence he is willing to sacrifice on a scale even more massive than 2001-09-11. It demolishes the argument that the Mr. Bush would find complicity in a crime such as 2001-09-11 unthinkable.

Most Americans dismiss the notion 2001-09-11 could have been an inside job. It was just too monstrous a crime. Yet Bush committed a far larger crime, crying wolf about Iraq being about to nuke the USA with drones in order to panic the country into starting a war with Iraq. The death toll from that crime was perhaps 40 times larger, so Bush is certainly capable of evil on that magnitude.

If you want to cut to the chase, here is what I think really happened. The important first step is not discovering what really happened, but proving that the official story is a lie, not just untrue, but a lie.

This page is posted
on the web at:

Optional Replicator mirror
on local hard disk J:

Canadian Mind Products
Please the feedback from other visitors, or your own feedback about the site.
Contact Roedy. Please feel free to link to this page without explicit permission.

Your face IP:[]
You are visitor number