image provider

Canadian Mind Products •

CMP (Canadian Mind Products)’s purpose is to stand up for the rights of plants and animals. Animals also includes cetacea, humans, gay people, atheists, war victims and invertebrates. CMP attempts to inculcate planetary consciousness — concern for the planet as a whole. A subgoal is to teach people to use computers effectively, particularly with the Java computer language.
Computer Hardware Buyers’ Glossary
Java glossary
RSS feed for the website general ethical concerns
RSS feed
monitor changes
to this website
(except the
Java Glossary)
leaf logo
blue whale
Animal Rights
Human Rights
Living Love
Gay & Black glossary
phonePhone Lists religion
Buddha eyes
Windows 10
Windows 10
Fair TradeFair Trade
site overview  Site
The image in the top left corner is comforting lies.

Four Kinds of Religion

There are four rough categories of religion:

  1. No beliefs outside consensus reality. The appeal is fellowship, music, ritual, festivals, special foods.
  2. Insisting as absolutely true absurd things where there is no way to tell for sure if they are true.
  3. Insisting as absolutely true things that are provably false.
  4. Irrational beliefs causing adherents to harm others and/or their children.

You might say people who insist they have eternal life belong in category (2), but that belief makes them more prone to risky behaviour and to kill others. You might say that creationists who block science education belong in (3), but that belief effectively takes a society back to the middle ages and prevents those affected from getting good jobs.

So when atheists do battle with religion, (1) and (2) are not the target. Sometimes atheists go after (3) because of the general negative effect of spreading lies. If believers did not try to convince others of falsehoods, there would be no problem. Atheists are primarily after (4).

The harm religion does is more important to atheists than the nuttiness. However, the handle to fight religion is its looniness.

Google has insisted I remove all images of the Iraq war and torture at Abu Ghraib from this website. If I do not, they will block my ad revenue which I use to fund my ISP (Internet Service Provider) bill. Google offers no way to talk to a human to negotiate, so I have decided to split in two. The controversial stuff will go on a new ad-free site called The technical sections will remain on will have Google Adsense ads but will not. Splitting is a surprisingly labour-intensive undertaking. The hold up now is my ISP is too busy to set up the new websites. For now, you should not notice any difference.

On Sin

The whole conception of Sin is one which I find very puzzling, doubtless owing to my sinful nature. If Sin consisted in causing needless suffering, I could understand; but on the contrary, sin often consists in avoiding needless suffering. Some years ago, in the English House of Lords, a bill was introduced to legalize euthanasia in cases of painful and incurable disease. The patient’s consent was to be necessary, as well as several medical certificates. To me, in my simplicity, it would seem natural to require the patient’s consent, but the late Archbishop of Canterbury, the English official expert on Sin, explained the erroneousness of such a view. The patient’s consent turns euthanasia into suicide and suicide is sin. Their Lordships listened to the voice of authority and rejected the bill. Consequently, to please the Archbishop — and his God, if reports truly — victims of cancer still have to endure months of wholly useless agony, unless their doctors or nurses are sufficiently humane to risk a charge of murder. I find difficulty in the conception of a God who gets pleasure from contemplating such tortures; and if there were a God capable of such wanton cruelty, I should certainly not think Him worthy of worship. But that only proves how sunk I am in moral depravity.

~ Bertrand Russell (born:1872-05-18 died:1970-02-02 at age:97) An Outline Of Intellectual Rubbish

Damage Database

We need a global database that consolidates environmental information about products, chemicals and components that tells you how much damage they do to the environment:

  • how much CO₂ or equivalent greenhouse gases are emitted per unit to manufacture this item.
  • how much electric power was consumed to manufacture this item.
  • how much water was needed to produce this item.
  • How much of various pollutants were released to the environment to manufacture this item.
  • Cost of landfill/recycling to deal with this item’s end-of-life.

Then a computer could compare two manufacturing processes, or consumer items for environmental friendliness. You could boil it down to a friendliness rating to help guide every consumer purchase. It would be organised as the mother of all BOMP (Bill Of Materials Processor), allowing loops, e.g. the impact of steel depends on the impact of the use of electricity used to make it and the impact of electricity depends on the impact of the steel used to build the electric grid.

For example, if the CO₂ impact of manufacturing changes NaOH, (sodium hydroxide) that impact would propagate to all processes that use NaOH.

~ Roedy (born:1948-02-04 age:68)
Please feel free to use any of the quotations or public service ads on the site on your own website, blog or social media page.
Minor Hassle PAD submission sites

This page is posted
on the web at:

Optional Replicator mirror
on local hard disk J:

Please the feedback from other visitors, or your own feedback about the site.
Contact Roedy. Please feel free to link to this page without explicit permission.

Your face IP:[]
You are visitor number