I have been disturbed by the corruption of the American political process. Some of the problems include:
All democracies have these or similar problems. My solution is proxy voting on every bill.
- Politicians are highly susceptible to influence by the wealthy because they need huge amounts of money to get
- Candidates can campaign on one platform then vote the opposite way.
- Votes in different parts of the country to do not count equally.
- The electoral college does not necessarily reflect the democratic vote.
How It Works
Potentially every citizen has the right to vote on every bill. This is managed electronically over the Internet using
a digital signature system to prevent fraud. The votes are counted by several totally independent teams. Basically
anyone who wants to put up the money to tabulate votes can become a scrutineer.
Of course most people have not the time or interest to vote on every bill. They have several options:
You always have the right to override your normal proxy vote, to revoke that proxy at any time, not just at election
time, or to reassign your proxy for any interest area.
- Turn their vote over to a friend to vote for them in that area.
- Turn their vote over to an organisation to vote for them in that area.
- Turn their vote over to a pundit to vote for them in that area.
- Turn their vote over to a politician (elected on unelected) to vote for them in that area.
- Turn their vote over to a political party to vote for them in that area.
- Abstain from voting on such issues.
- Your votes are cast pretty much as you would cast them had you to the time to study all the bills.
- You are not stuck with a dishonest representative. You can fire him at any time.
- You don’t have to stay on top of everything to have your influence felt everywhere you feel is
- The people in general are more or less in charge. There is no one in particular you can blame when things go
- Those who have the power now, who rule by bamboozlement and deception, will not like such a scheme. They want a
scheme with only a few corruptible people charge.
- It becomes technically difficult to simultaneously provide both anonymity and fraud prevention.
- There will be extreme temptation to corrupt the system. Since it relies on electronics, it is easier to hide
- Politicians could still sneak through unpopular line items in omnibus bills. Proxy voting should give those
interested, or indirectly interested, the right to vote item by item on any bill if they choose. Electronics make
this all feasible for the first time.
In a way we are using proxy voting already. Polls that direct politicians are a statistical sampling proxy vote. They
are different in that people don’t vote on bills, but rather carefully worded questions designed to elicit the
correct answer. They are also different in that they are not legally binding.
Technology makes it possible to hold electronic referenda much more cheaply than full elections. Those without
understanding of the technology can still participate via proxy voting. It also creates a grass roots democracy, of
representatives of perhaps only dozen people in some area of expertise. This decentralising should go a long way
toward breaking up the corruption of our current representative governments.
You phase this in gradually, giving say 10% of the votes on a bill to the proxy
system, and gradually up the percentage once we find out how it works in practice. This has a similar democratisation
to the proportional representation, without bringing disruptive elements into government.
available on the web at:
optional Replicator mirror
on local hard disk J:
Please email your
feedback for publication
letters to the editor, errors, omissions, typos, formatting errors, ambiguities, unclear
wording, broken/redirected link reports, suggestions to improve this page or comments to
If you want your message, your name or email kept confidential,
not considered for public posting, please explicitly specify that.
Unless you state otherwise,
I will treat your message as a letter to the editor that I may or may not publish
After that, it will be too late to retract it.
If you disagree with something I said, especially when sending an ad-hominem attack,
a rant composed mainly of obscenities or a death threat, please quote the offending passage
and cite the web page where you found it, tell me why
you think it is wrong,
and, if possible, provide some supporting evidence.
I can’t very well fix erroneous or ambiguous text if I can’t find it.
|no blog for this page
Your face IP:[18.104.22.168]
||You are visitor number