If you invented a sorting algorithm that was o(n²) that means the sorting time is proportional to n² where n in the number of elements to sort. An o(n) sort would be one that has constant time per item, proportional to the number of items. An o(n²) algorithm might beat an o(n) algorithm for small n, but above some number, the o(n) will be faster.
| Meaning of O(n) Notation | |
|---|---|
| Notation | Meaning |
| O(1) | means constant. It does not depend on how many items there are, e.g. indexing an array. |
| O(n) | algorithm is linear. The time it will take is proportional to n. It takes the same amount of time to handle each item no matter how many items there are. RadixSort is O(n). |
| O(n log(n)) | Most of the commonly used sorts. |
| O(n²) | An algorithm varies as the square of the number of times. If you have twice as many items to process it will take four times as long. Most novice sort have this unfortunate property. |
| You can get the freshest copy of this page from: | or possibly from your local J: drive (Java virtual drive/mindprod.com website mirror) | |
| http://mindprod.com/jgloss/onsquared.html | J:\mindprod\jgloss\onsquared.html | |
![]() | ||
| Canadian Mind Products | ||
| mindprod.com IP:[65.110.21.43] | ||
| view Blog | Your face IP:[38.107.191.105] | |
| Feedback | You are visitor number 5,914. | |