The Life of Riley
by Roedy Green ©1996-2009 Canadian Mind Products
The CurrCon Java Applet displays prices on this web page converted with today’s exchange rates into your local
international currency, e.g. Euros, US dollars, Canadian dollars, British Pounds, Indian Rupees… CurrCon requires
Java 1.1 or later, preferably 1.6.0_14. If you can’t see the prices, or if you just
want to learn more about CurrCon, click
here for help.
The Life of Riley On Welfare
Republicans, and the Canadian equivalent, BC Liberals, imagine those living on welfare have it made. They sleep when
they want do, drink, smoke tobacco and marijuana all they want. They never have to work. They have endless sex. They are
sponging off the body politic without ever doing a stick of work in their entire lives.
Sponges
Let’s have a look at the reality. I am going to talk about BC Canada, a socialist haven where welfare benefits are
particularly rich. The conditions for welfare recipients in the USA are even more Spartan. To start, welfare benefits
run out after two years. At most someone can live off welfare for two years, and they have to work several years first.
So even the laziest sponge has to work 40 years and can goof off for two. After two years, the sponge is thrown into the
streets to die of exposure in the Canadian winters. There are overnight shelters for the homeless, but there is room for
only about half those seeking shelter.
If working hard were what made you rich, most people would retire with a big nest egg. They don’t. The people who
get very rich do it by some form of thieving, cheating or exploitation. They can’t do it by hard work alone. I
find it hard to understand why so many people revere the rich. The rich are the true sponges on society. They take far
more than they put in.
Who’s on Welfare
The modern industrial economy needs fewer and fewer people to work. About 8% of people
are just a nuisance. When I advertised jobs in the newspaper, scores of applicants would bury my desk with their resumes.
I had to reject all but one them. There are some people, who are uglier than normal, who have an unpleasant voice, who
have few skills, who belong to an unpopular minority, who will never be at the top of the heap and get the job. There
are simply 8% more people than jobs. Some people will the losers, time after time no
matter how many time they apply.
People unable to work because of a medical or mental condition also end up on welfare. It can take years for the
bureaucracy to deal with permanent disability with other schemes.
Welfare Benefits
In 1970, the welfare benefits were
a month. In 2005, they rose to
. The catch is there has been 100% inflation over the last 35
years, so in effect the benefits have been halved.
Welfare Budgeting
Let’s see how far that
goes. The cheapest shared accommodation you will find in Victoria where I live is
per person. That leaves
a month for everything else. If you spent it all on food, that will only get you one bag of groceries three times a
month. It you buy nothing but generic Kraft dinner, Ramen noodles, cheap bread, flour, rice, bulk corn flakes and mostly-fat
chicken wieners you might stretch than to one bag a week.
Impossible Luxuries
So everything else but food is an unaffordable luxury which includes such things as:
- dentistry. If you get a toothache, tough. (Fortunately, medical care is covered in Canada including prescriptions.)
- telephone, cell-phone
- cable TV
- Internet connection
- movies
- alcohol, tobacco
- electricity (hopefully included in rent)
- heat (hopefully included in rent)
- clothing, shoes, socks and underwear. You have to make do with what people give you.
- laundry. You wash your clothes in the bathtub and lay them out to dry on the floor.
- going to coffee or to a restaurant with friends
- bus fare
- car, gasoline, insurance
- candy, ice cream, soft drinks
- headache pills, cough syrup
- pet food
- bicycle repairs or parts
- paper, ink or computer supplies
- shampoo, conditioner
- books, magazines
- music CDs
- furniture. You have to make do with what you can find discarded on the street.
Welfare Entertainment
So what’s your entertainment:
- a jar of cheap instant coffee. All other drugs legal and illegal are too expensive.
- free newspapers and magazines
- free TV, perhaps one or two channels you can get without cable.
- public library. At your first fine, that’s the end of takeout privileges.
- free lectures
- hanging out with friends
- sex
Job Search
My company used have about eight employees. I dreaded the process of advertising an entry level job. There would be a
stack of resumes a foot deep on my desk. I would have to narrow it down and spend days interviewing people. You could
see the desperation in people’s eyes. To get a job, the applicant had to be the very best in the pile. The
majority of the people would never be the best in the pile no matter how many jobs they applied for. Their only
hope was to get a job though the influence of a powerful friend or find a job that nobody else was willing to take like
door to door selling on commission where you have to put money up front to buy your demo vacuum cleaner. Then there is
that old catch-22, to get a job, you need experience, and to get experience you need a job.
Tax Breaks
If you make any money at all, e.g.
collecting recyclable cans, that money comes off the top. Your next month’s cheque will be
lower. You are effectively taxed at 100%. In fact, it is even worse. Let’s say you tried to start a home business
making cookies and you sold them for
. Your next month’s cheque would be
lower, even though the ingredients cost
. You don’t get to deduct your business expenses the way any other business person would. You are effectively
taxed at 200%. This is hardly an incentive to work.
I find it amazing that wealthy Republicans and Canadian Liberals will go to bat for the elite demanding their taxes be
lowered to stimulate the super rich to work harder. Yet they seem to think negative incentives to work are perfectly ok
for the supposed deadbeats of society. But who really needs the incentive? Get real!
Criminal Activity
Imagine yourself in a position where you had to give up every creature comfort. You might be tempted to panhandle just
to get a sugar fix. You too might be tempted to sell marijuana to make a few bucks. People in prisons are better fed
than those on welfare. The system almost demands that welfare recipients cheat on reporting income or turn to crime just
to survive. The system discourages work. Those who created this system should not whine when it fails. I feel like
gagging every time I hear a Republican or BC Liberal complaining about how generous he is to the undeserving bums on
welfare.
The Homeless
Homeless people receive even less,
a month each. This amount is small enough to ensure they can’t ever accumulate the
plus
security deposit to get into the cheapest possible shared accommodation.
Most of the homeless people start out as runaway kids escaping sexually and physically abusive parents.
Conservative Motivation
Small c conservative politicians I have talked to admit that housing Victoria’s 600 homeless would be much cheaper
than leaving them on the streets to frighten tourists away from business, clog emergency rooms at the hospitals and keep
the police occupied. It would be cheaper even for the hard-to-house alcoholics, mentally ill and drug addicts who
require supervision.
The problem is ideological. Politicians want the homeless punished by freezing to death for being homeless as an
incentive to make them acquire the initiative to accept the jobs the politicians admit don’t exist. Victoria Mayor
Alan Lowe’s solution is to order the police to confiscate the sleeping bags and backpacks of homeless people
hoping this will encourage them to stop being homeless. That sort of treatment won’t encourage anyone. It
will just fill them with despair and drive them to slow suicide.
It is thus, not greed, but spite, that motives the conservative politicians. Conservatives sadistically demand that
society pile on even more abuse on the homeless than they have already suffered. They want the homeless to suffer even
if it costs the taxpayer more money to arrange that, than to treat them humanely.
Some conservatives justify this malice with the need to winnow society of those they consider the dregs, in a Nazi
misinterpretation of Darwin. Darwin and the evolutionists never used the phrase “survival of the fittest”.
They talk of “differential reproductive success” — some individuals have slightly better reproductive
success — more offspring living to reproduce. 18th century industrialists deliberately misinterpreted Darwin to
morally justify exploiting their workers and destroying the environment with “dark Satanic mills”. They fail
to realise that the current crop of humans are the stock who have survived for millions of generations. Despite
appearances, they are the fittest of the fit. They are all la crème de la crème. Only in the
eyes of the well-to-do are some of them evolutionary losers deserving of deliberate extermination as if being unwanted
by the economy were the ultimate crime. It is the same motivation that lead Hitler to exterminate the retarded, then the
mentally ill, then the homosexuals, then the Jews, then the Communists, then anyone who was not Aryan. This persecution
of the homeless is a cruel and crazy dash for perfection, where perfection is defined in a preposterously arbitrary way.
The ability to tolerate being confined a cubicle all day is not one of the skills crucial to the long term survival of
humanity. It is a skill that will be obsolete within 50 years. It is thus silly to exterminate
people on the grounds they don’t have it for the good of the race.
Summary
For some reason, Republicans and BC Liberals want to punish the poor even more severely than they punish child rapists.
The capitalists of the world have created an economic system that discards 8% of people
as useless. I say, stop blaming the victims and treat them with human decency. Everyone deserves a guaranteed liveable
income, just for being a human. Over time, the economy will discard a higher and higher percentage of people, until it
nobody at all is required to make it function. When that day comes, surely we won’t demand everyone starve,
surrounded by plenty, just because the economy no longer requires human labour. Let’s gradually get used to the
idea that technology pays a dividend — one by one freeing humanity from drudgery and want. The dividend belongs to
everyone, not just the capitalists.
Links
- NDP party: a federal political party with a strong plank on
homelessness.
- The End of Work
- Comer: The Committee on
Monetary and Economic Reform,
a left wing economics think tank.
- Canadian Action Party: a fringe Canadian federal
political party that has economic reforms of the banking system as planks.
Please email your feedback for publication, errors, omissions, broken/redirected link reports
