Non Violent Communication
by Roedy Green ©1996-2008 Canadian Mind Products
 |
recommend book⇒Nonviolent Communication: a language Of Compassion |
| | paperback |
|---|
| ISBN10: | 1-892005-02-6 |
|---|
| ISBN13: | 978-1-892005-02-1 |
|---|
| publisher: | Puddledancer Press |
| published: | 2003-09-28 |
| by: | Marshall B. Rosenberg |
|
|
Introduction
Ken Keyes, the founder of Living Love, never mentioned the NVC (nonviolent
communication) work of Dr. Marshall B. Rosenberg, but I’m sure had he
encountered it, he would have loved it, and would have incorporated it into the
formal living love system. You can think of NVC as an elaboration of the prescriptions
for Happiness, as a variant EIP process, or as an
elaboration of positive intentions.
NVC In A Nutshell
According to Dr. Rosenberg, humans speak two languages, Jackal and Giraffe (the
land animal with the biggest heart). Jackal is mostly about blaming others for
our pain. Jackal is mostly concerned with the past. Giraffe, on the other hand
rigidly confines itself to four topics:
- Observations of what is happening now. These are Sergeant Friday, just-the-facts-Ma’am
descriptions, without evaluating, moralising or blaming.
- What I am feeling, and what I guess you are feeling.
- What it is I think I need and what it is I think you need.
- Concise, specific, concrete, doable, clear requests of others to meet those
needs. A five year old would likely be able to tell if the request were granted. You
can’t ask that X love you, but you can ask for a kiss or a cherry pie. State
them postively, what you want others to do, not want you want them to avoid
doing.
When Giraffe speakers encounter Jackal speakers, Giraffes try to guess the
feelings and needs behind the Jackal blame and shame games. This is much easier
said that done. Giraffes try to help Jackals focus on their own present feelings
and needs.
What Rosenberg discovered, is when you get a group of people (mixed Giraffe and
Jackal speakers) focussing on their own feelings and needs, automatically they
start to co-operate to help each other get those needs met — even Rwandans
who days earlier where slicing each other’s children to bits.
A skilled Giraffe can figure out what the feelings and needs are behind a
vicious attack, and sees those needs and feelings only, ignoring the attack
itself. Giraffes don’t concern themselves with what Jackals think, just how they
are feeling and what they need. They constantly lead the Jackals away from their
thoughts and judgements to their feelings and needs.
NVC Notions
The word should is short hand for "I want that
person punished for doing that. I want them to suffer." It is therefore a
word not used in Giraffe.
People don’t make you angry, your attack thoughts about them do.
If you are not in touch with your needs and feelings, chances are you won’t be
very skillful in getting your needs met.
Jackals make the error of blaming some other person, rather than going directly
for getting their needs met.
The way you tell a request from a demand, is what you do if the other person
does not fulfill it.
Jackals are usually completely unaware of their needs.
If someone is psychologically troubled, it does not help to dwell on the past or
root about in the past to discover the causes of the current malaise. It is
better to focus on what current feelings and needs are and what could be done to
satisfy those needs.
Both praise and blame are attempts to manipulate. They will eventually backfire.
Let your appreciations be heartfelt.
Empathy
A good Giraffe spends a lot of time paraphrasing what others tell him to let
those people know they have been understood. It turns out this is what people
need far more than having their problems fixed for them.
People attempting to be empathetic will typically make the following errors:
- advising: "I think you should…" "How come you didn’t?"
- one-upping: " That’s nothing; wait’ll you hear what happened to me."
- educating: "This could turn into a very positive experience for you if you
just…"
- consoling: "It wasn’t your fault; you did the best you could."
- story-telling: "That reminds me of the time…"
- shutting down: "Cheer up. Don’t feel so bad."
- sympathising: "Oh, you poor thing…"
- interrogating: "When did this begin?"
- explaining: "I would have called, but…"
- correcting: "That’s not how it happened."
What is more likely to work is trying to glean the troubled person’s feelings and
needs and echo them back to them, until both you and the person you are talking
to are clearly aware of them.
Links