open source : Java Glossary

open source
A project where the source code is available to look at. You may still have to pay a fee to view it. GNU Public Licence copyleft is the most common type.

To be considered open source, the license for use must permit at least modification and reuse of the source, perhaps subject to certain conditions, but not costing money. The source must be either explicitly or implictly part of every distribution, and the source itself is either included or readily available at no cost. You may charge for the software, but you may not charge extra for the source.

Legally it would be software distributed under one of the OSI opensource licenses.

Some of the better known Java open source projects include: JOS, Kaffe (free virtual machine), GNU and the Java language, GCC for Java, GNU Classpath (free Java libraries), J-Emacs, Intel Open Runtime Platform, XML-projects of the Apache group (mostly Java based), Tomcat.

The advantages to the customer of open source are:

The advantages to the vendor of open source are: The disadvantages to the vendor of open source are:

One problem with open source is that the military likes it. They can inspect the code. They can add secure extensions. If you write open source software with the usual licences, you are behaving like the plumber at Auschwitz. To avoid this, I mark my software non-military use only.

OSI (Open Software Initiative) provides an open source agreement that gives more freedom that GPL (Gnu Public Licence).


CMP homejump to top

available on the web at:

http://mindprod.com/jgloss/opensource.html
  

optional Replicator mirror
of mindprod.com
on local hard disk J:

J:\mindprod\jgloss\opensource.html
logo
Please email your , letters to the editor, errors, omissions, typos, formatting errors, ambiguities, unclear wording, broken/redirected link reports, suggestions to improve this page or comments to Roedy Green : feedback email. If you want your message, your name or email kept confidential, not considered for public posting, please explicitly specify that. Unless you state otherwise, I will treat your message as a letter to the editor that I may or may not publish in the feedback section. After that, it will be too late to retract it. If you disagree with something I said, especially when sending an ad-hominem attack, a rant composed mainly of obscenities or a death threat, please quote the offending passage and cite the web page where you found it, tell me why you think it is wrong, and, if possible, provide some supporting evidence. I can’t very well fix erroneous or ambiguous text if I can’t find it.
Blog
IP:[65.110.21.43]
Your face IP:[54.224.79.93]
You are visitor number 9,639.