Suppose further that a class Animal_printer implements the method:
void print(Animal a);
Can I say that Animal_printer implements Dog_printer? Logically, I should be able to. Anywhere that a Dog_printer is expected, I can supply an Animal_printer, and the dog will get printed. (Because all dogs are animals.) So, logically, there is the relation:
Animal_printer is a subtype of Dog_printer.
Although logically correct, this is weird looking. Then again, something that can print any animal "extends" something that can print any dog, so maybe it isn’t so weird. Anyway, to determine whether Animal_printer is a subtype of Dog_printer, we have used the "contravariant argument rule". Similarly, there is a "covariant return value rule" that would state that:
Dog_creator is a subtype of Animal_creator.
![]() |
and suggestions to improve this page to Roedy Green : | ||
| Canadian Mind Products | |||
| mindprod.com IP:[65.110.21.43] | |||
| Your face IP:[38.103.63.59] | The information on this page is for non-military use only. | ||
| You are visitor number 7,616. | Military use includes use by defence contractors. | ||
| You can get a fresh copy of this page from: | or possibly from your local J: drive (Java virtual drive/mindprod.com website mirror) | ||
| http://mindprod.com/jgloss/contravariance.html | J:\mindprod\jgloss\contravariance.html | ||